Filing periods
"Three years" describes at least three different mechanisms
Key points
- California runs three years from the date proof was required — not from purchase, and not from the offense.
- Texas releases at the second anniversary of the collision, conditional on no damages action having been brought.
- Washington's three years are a rolling look-back: a qualifying conviction partway through moves the end date rather than adding to it.
- Florida's FR-44 period is measured from the date driving privileges were reinstated, which is later than most people count from.
Update, 22 September 2026. This note compared the four states whose filing periods had been read when it was written. More have been read since — including Georgia and Ohio, which run only one year and anchor that year at opposite ends of the suspension. The current side-by-side is in the filing-period guide. The four designs below are unchanged; there are simply more of them now.
Ask how long an SR-22 lasts and you get a number. Three years, usually. The number is fine as far as it goes, and it goes about a quarter of the way.
What actually determines when this ends is not the length. It is the design: what the clock is anchored to, whether anything stops it, and whether an event during the period extends it or restarts it. Four states, read from their own statutes, use three visibly different designs.
Elapsed time from a date you did not pick
California’s provision is written backwards from how you would expect. It does not say “you must file for three years”. It lists circumstances in which the department may cancel a filing, and one of them is that three years have passed from the date the proof was required.
Note what that is not. Not the date of the offense. Not the date you bought a policy. Not the date the certificate was accepted. If you spent six weeks finding a carrier willing to file, those six weeks sit inside the period and bought you nothing.
Elapsed time from the event, conditional on nobody suing
Texas anchors to the collision instead. The suspension framework releases at the second anniversary of the date of the collision, provided the department is satisfied that no action for damages arising out of that collision was brought during the two-year period.
Two things follow. It is shorter than California’s. And it is conditional on something entirely outside your control — whether anyone sued. That second half is almost never mentioned in summaries of Texas requirements, and it is the half that could move your date.
A rolling look-back, which is a different animal
Washington is the one worth reading properly.
The department may release the requirement after three years from the date proof was required — but only where the three-year period immediately preceding the request contains no conviction, bail forfeiture, or finding that a traffic infraction has been committed that would require or permit another suspension or revocation.
Read as a countdown it looks identical to California’s. It is not. A qualifying conviction eighteen months in does not add eighteen months at the end. The window the department examines now contains that conviction, and will keep containing it until three years have passed from the new event.
The practical consequence is specific and unglamorous: during a Washington filing period, the infraction that would ordinarily be a ticket and a rate bump is potentially a reset of the whole period. And the statutory test is not “a serious offense” — it is any conviction, forfeiture or infraction finding that would require or permit a suspension.
A record test wearing a calendar’s clothes
Florida’s FR-44 runs for a minimum period of three years. But the exemption that ends it is written as a clean-record test: no DUI and no felony traffic offense for three years from the date of reinstatement of driving privileges.
Reinstatement is a later date than conviction, often by months. People who count from the courtroom finish late, and generally find out by asking a question they assumed was a formality.
One suspension, five end dates
The designs are easier to see with a single set of dates run through them. Take a one-year suspension that starts on 1 March 2026, runs to its last day on 28 February 2027, and ends with the license restored on 1 March 2027 — the first day it could be. The arithmetic below applies each state’s own words to those dates. It compares clocks only: what triggers the requirement in the first place differs from state to state, and each state’s page sets that out.
Ohio counts one year from the date the suspension was imposed. On these dates the year is already over on the day the license comes back, 1 March 2027. The filing in that design runs alongside the suspension rather than after it.
Georgia counts one year from the date the license is restored, and revokes the license if proof is missing at any point in that year. Same dates, a year later: the filing runs to 1 March 2028.
Wyoming says a suspended driver files and maintains proof “for a three (3) year period beginning on the date of suspension”. Counted from 1 March 2026, that is 1 March 2029 — two years after reinstatement, not three.
Idaho uses “a three (3) year period commencing with the last day of the suspension or revocation”. The last day here is 28 February 2027, so the period runs to 28 February 2030.
Nevada, for a suspension for failing to maintain proof, requires proof “for 3 years after the date of the reinstatement of his or her license”. From 1 March 2027 that is 1 March 2030 — and Nevada’s release section has no clean-record early exit to shorten it.
So one suspension produces end dates spread across three years, from the day of reinstatement to three years after it. Nobody reading “three years” in a summary could have told which. The only reliable input is the section your own notice cites, and the date it counts from.
What behaves the same everywhere
One thing. A lapse in the underlying policy is not a pause, in any of them. The insurer notifies the state, the license action resumes, and re-filing starts a fresh certificate rather than resuming the old one. There is no version of this where two months uninsured shortens the two months you have left.
Which produces the only three pieces of advice here that survive crossing a state line. Pay annually rather than monthly if you can, because the commonest cause of a lapse is a missed installment rather than a decision. Never let an old policy end before the new filing is confirmed accepted. And when you think you have reached the end, ask — in Washington the release is something you request, and filings left running past their earliest release date are extremely common.
Sources cited on this page
- Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16480(a)(2) (reproduction read)
- Tex. Transp. Code sec. 601.162 (reproduction read)
- RCW 46.29.600 (reproduction read)
- Fla. Stat. sec. 324.023
- Wyo. Stat. sec. 31-7-128(e)
- Idaho Code sec. 49-1208 (reproduction read)
- Nev. Rev. Stat. sec. 485.3075 (reproduction read)
- O.C.G.A. sec. 40-9-80 (reproduction read)
Every figure above was read from the source it is attributed to on September 19, 2026. How we check this.
Been told to file?
Send your ZIP and we will carry it up to the form. Nothing is charged to you.
Request SR-22 quotes
Four fields. We pass requests only to licensed agencies that file SR-22s, when one is taking them.
Your request is ready to send
Here is what happens after you submit:
- We pass your details only to licensed insurance agencies that advertise for your state, and only when one is taking requests.
- No more than three of them may contact you, using the details you gave.
- You decide who, if anyone, you buy from. You are committed to nothing.
We are not an insurance agency and we do not place cover. Nothing sent through this form binds, alters or renews any policy.