SR-22, FR-44, and the other names for the same filing
A court or a state agency has told you to file something. Depending on which state, the document is called an SR-22, an FR-44, a certificate of insurance, or a certificate of motor vehicle liability insurance — and two of those are the same instrument while the others are not. The amounts behind them run from $10,000 to $300,000. This page sorts out which word you are holding.
Every word for it, and what turns on the difference
Read the middle column first. Almost every term a driver is handed comes from an insurer, a court clerk or a form, and almost none of them is the term the statute uses — which matters, because the statute is where the amounts and the deadline live.
| What you were told | What the law calls it | What turns on the difference |
|---|---|---|
| SR-22 | American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators Uniform Financial Responsibility Form (SR-22)Va. Code sec. 46.2-439 | An association form, not a state one. That is why the name is the same in every state that uses it and the amounts behind it are not. |
| FR-44 | Virginia Uniform Financial Responsibility Form (FR-44)Va. Code sec. 46.2-439 · Va. Code sec. 46.2-316(C) | In Virginia the form name is in the statute, and it carries limits “not less than double” the ordinary minimum. |
| FR-44 (Florida) | no form name appears in the chapter; the amounts are set directlyFla. Stat. ch. 324 (index and ss. 324.021, 324.023, 324.031 as read) · Fla. Stat. sec. 324.023 | Florida legislates the higher limits and leaves the paperwork to the department. Quoting a Florida FR-44 to a statute section is quoting the amounts, not the form. |
| “SR-22 insurance” | motor vehicle liability policyFla. Stat. sec. 324.021(8) | There is no such product. You buy a policy; a certificate is filed against it. Shopping the certificate is shopping the wrong thing. |
| proof of financial responsibility | the defined term that carries the dollar amountsCal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) · Fla. Stat. sec. 324.021(7) | This is where the money is set. The form is only evidence that the money exists. |
| proof of financial responsibility in the future | the continuing version of the same dutyRCW 46.29.260 · Va. Code sec. 46.2-439 | Washington's statute says the two terms are synonymous. The word “future” is what makes a lapse reportable rather than merely unfortunate. |
| certificate of insurance | the filing itself, in states that never say “SR-22”A.R.S. sec. 28-4077(A) | Arizona's chapter describes the whole mechanism without once using the form number a searcher would type. |
| certificate of motor vehicle liability insurance | the same filing again, under a third nameTex. Transp. Code sec. 601.083(a) | Texas. The certificate names no amounts; it points at another section, so the figure moves when that section moves. |
| “financial responsibility filing” | methods of proving financial responsibilityVa. Code sec. 46.2-436 · Fla. Stat. sec. 324.031 · A.R.S. sec. 28-4076 | Insurance is one of four routes. The other three exist in every one of these chapters and are almost never mentioned to a driver. |
| cash or certificate of deposit | proof by deposit of money or securitiesFla. Stat. sec. 324.023 (certificate of deposit route, s. 324.031(2)) · A.R.S. sec. 28-4076 | The route nobody takes. Florida prices it at $350,000 for a driver in FR-44 territory, which is the legislature's own view of the exposure. |
| self-insurance | certificate of self-insuranceFla. Stat. sec. 324.031 · A.R.S. sec. 28-4009(A)(2)(a) | In Arizona a self-insurer is expressly left on the pre-July-2020 amounts, so the “old” figures are a live rule rather than history. |
The single most useful line in that table is the first one. The SR-22 is an association form, published by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, and Virginia's statute names it as such. That is the explanation for the thing everyone finds confusing: the form number is identical across state lines and the money behind it is not remotely identical.
Why the same filing has four names
The form is national by adoption, not by law. The amounts are not.
No federal statute is involved, but the paperwork behaves as though one were, because the states adopted a common form through an administrators' association rather than each inventing one. So the document that lands on a desk in Phoenix and the one that lands in Tallahassee look alike and certify wildly different sums.
Va. Code sec. 46.2-439 · 2026 edition, verified September 2, 2026
Verbatim: the certificate “shall be an American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators Uniform Financial Responsibility Form (SR-22), or Virginia Uniform Financial Responsibility Form (FR-44), depending on the circumstances.” The SR-22 is an association form. That is why the name travels across state lines while the amounts do not.
State’s own copy of this section: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter3/section46.2-439/
Some states legislate the amounts and ignore the form
Florida is the clean example. Its financial responsibility chapter sets the ordinary proof figure, sets a much higher figure for a driver convicted of driving under the influence, and never names a form in either place. Searching the Florida statutes for the string most people type returns nothing — the chapter index and the three operative sections were read for this page and neither “SR-22” nor “FR-44” appears in any of them.
That is not an oversight. It is a division of labour: the legislature sets the exposure, the department chooses the stationery. It also means any page that cites a Florida statute for a Florida form name is citing something that is not there.
Some states name the form in the statute, and then move the money
Virginia does the opposite. One section names both the SR-22 and the FR-44, and a second section attaches the doubled limits to a specific list of convictions. The amounts themselves are never written out — the statute says “double” and points at the ordinary minimum.
Va. Code sec. 46.2-316(C) · 2026 edition, verified September 2, 2026
The amounts are never written out. The subsection sets them by reference, for each of the three limits, and runs for three years after the person otherwise becomes entitled to a license.
State’s own copy of this section: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter3/section46.2-316/
Which means Virginia's FR-44 figure is arithmetic rather than text. Today the ordinary minimum is $50,000 per person / $100,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage, so the FR-44 is $100,000 per person / $200,000 per accident / $50,000 property damage. On the day Virginia next moves the ordinary minimum, the FR-44 moves by itself, and every page that typed the old number out by hand becomes wrong without anyone editing it.
And some states describe the whole machine without the word
Arizona's chapter explains who files, what the certificate must contain, what happens if it lapses and what the alternatives are, and never uses the number a searcher would type. Texas calls it a certificate of motor vehicle liability insurance. Neither is being obscure; both predate the form number becoming the popular name.
What the difference is worth, in dollars and in years
This is the part the naming confusion actually costs money on. The same word, in two states, is two different products; and in one state, two words are two different products.
| State and form | Short | Per person | Per crash | Property | Period | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida — ordinary SR-22 | 10/20/10 | $10,000 | $20,000 | $10,000 | — | Fla. Stat. sec. 324.021(7) |
| Florida — FR-44 after a DUI | 100/300/50 | $100,000 | $300,000 | $50,000 | 3 years | Fla. Stat. sec. 324.023 |
| Virginia — ordinary minimum | 50/100/25 | $50,000 | $100,000 | $25,000 | — | Va. Code sec. 46.2-472(B) |
| Virginia — FR-44 after a DUI | 100/200/50 | $100,000 | $200,000 | $50,000 | 3 years | Va. Code sec. 46.2-316(C) |
| California — SR-22 | 30/60/15 | $30,000 | $60,000 | $15,000 | 3 years | Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) |
| Texas — SR-22 | 30/60/25 | $30,000 | $60,000 | $25,000 | 2 years | Tex. Transp. Code sec. 601.072(a-1) |
| Washington — SR-22 | 25/50/10 | $25,000 | $50,000 | $10,000 | 3 years | RCW 46.29.090(1) |
| Arizona — SR-22 | 25/50/15 | $25,000 | $50,000 | $15,000 | 3 years | A.R.S. sec. 28-4009(A)(2)(b) |
| Ohio — SR-22 | 25/50/25 | $25,000 | $50,000 | $25,000 | one year | Ohio Rev. Code sec. 4509.51(B)(1)-(3) |
The Florida gap is 10 times, not a surcharge
An ordinary Florida filing certifies $10,000 for injury to one person. A Florida filing after a driving-under-the-influence conviction certifies $100,000. Same state, same filing mechanism, 10 times the cover — and the second one has to be carried for 3 years. Anyone collecting quotes without knowing which of the two applies to them is collecting numbers that cannot be compared.
Virginia's gap is exactly double, by construction
Virginia reaches a similar place by a different route, and the doubling applies to all three limits rather than to the headline one. The trigger list is specific: it is the subdivision covering driving under the influence, maiming while under the influence, and driving on a license forfeited for one of those.
Va. Code sec. 46.2-316(A)(4) · 2026 edition, verified September 2, 2026
Subsection (C) attaches the doubled limits to this subdivision only. The other offenses in subsection (A) get the ordinary minimum under subsection (B).
State’s own copy of this section: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter3/section46.2-316/
Not sure which form your state wants?
Enter your ZIP and we will carry it up to the form. Agencies that file in your state call you back.
Insurance is one of four ways to satisfy it
Every chapter read for this site lists the same set of methods, and a driver is usually told about exactly one of them.
| Method | In practice | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| A motor vehicle liability policy | The route essentially everyone takes. | Va. Code sec. 46.2-436 · Fla. Stat. sec. 324.031 |
| A bond | Executed by a surety. Virginia devotes eight sections to how it is conditioned, canceled and sued on. | Va. Code sec. 46.2-436 |
| A deposit of cash or securities | Florida sets it at $350,000 for a driver in FR-44 territory. Arizona routes it through its own section. | Fla. Stat. sec. 324.023 (certificate of deposit route, s. 324.031(2)) · A.R.S. sec. 28-4076 |
| A certificate of self-insurance | For fleets and for a narrow class of individual. In Arizona it also freezes you on the pre-July-2020 amounts. | Fla. Stat. sec. 324.031 · A.R.S. sec. 28-4009(A)(2)(a) |
Why the other three are not advice
They are real and they are in the statute, and for almost everyone they are unreachable. Florida prices the deposit route for a driver in FR-44 territory at $350,000 in cash or securities. That number is worth knowing anyway, because it is the legislature's own estimate of the exposure it is asking you to cover — it puts the premium you are about to be quoted in proportion.
Reading your own notice
Find the section number, not the form number
The form number tells you which stationery. The section number tells you the amounts, the period and the trigger, and it is the same in every copy of the code. If your notice cites a section, that is the string to search; if it only names a form, the department that sent it is the authority on which section it came from.
Check whether your state is an amounts state or a form state
If your notice says FR-44 and you are in Virginia, the statute names your form and doubles your limits. If it says FR-44 and you are in Florida, the statute sets your limits and is silent about the form. Both are correct notices; they are just built differently, and a page written about one will mislead you about the other.
Then go to the page for your state
The amounts, the period and the clock's starting point are all state business. The state pages carry each one with its section, and the filing-period guide takes apart the four different ways these statutes measure time — one of which is a rolling look-back rather than a countdown.
Common questions
Is an SR-22 the same as a certificate of financial responsibility?
Usually yes. “SR-22” is the number on an American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators uniform form, named as such in Va. Code section 46.2-439. Several states never use the number at all and their statutes say “certificate of insurance” or “certificate of motor vehicle liability insurance” for the same filing.
Is an FR-44 just an SR-22 with a different number?
No. In Virginia the FR-44 is named in the same statute as the SR-22 and carries limits “not less than double” the ordinary minimum. In Florida the chapter does not name a form at all; it raises the amounts directly, to $100,000 per person against $10,000 for an ordinary filing.
What does “proof of financial responsibility in the future” mean?
It is the continuing version of the same duty, and Washington's statute says in terms that the two phrases are synonymous. The word “future” is what obliges the insurer to tell the state when the policy ends.
Do I have to use insurance to satisfy it?
No. Every chapter read for this site lists four methods: a policy, a bond, a deposit of cash or securities, or a certificate of self-insurance. Insurance is simply the only one most people can reach.
Why is the amount different in every state?
Because the form is uniform and the amounts are not. The certificate attests to that state's own minimum, and across the states read here those run from $10,000 to $300,000 depending on the state and the form.
Which name will be on my notice?
Whichever one the agency that issued it uses. The reliable move is to read the section number rather than the form number — the section is where the amounts and the period are set, and it is the same in every copy.
Where to go next
Sources cited on this page
- Va. Code sec. 46.2-439
- Va. Code sec. 46.2-316(C)
- Va. Code sec. 46.2-472(B)
- Va. Code sec. 46.2-436
- Fla. Stat. sec. 324.021(7)
- Fla. Stat. sec. 324.023
- Fla. Stat. sec. 324.031
- Fla. Stat. ch. 324 (index and ss. 324.021, 324.023, 324.031 as read)
- Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a)
- RCW 46.29.260
- A.R.S. sec. 28-4076
- A.R.S. sec. 28-4077(A)
- A.R.S. sec. 28-4009(A)(2)(a)
- Tex. Transp. Code sec. 601.083(a)
- Ohio Rev. Code sec. 4509.51(B)(1)-(3)
Every figure above was read from the source it is attributed to on September 19, 2026. How we check this.